🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial action to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are monitoring with great interest to see if this tactic will become a template for the rest of the world.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM declaring that smartphones and networks are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential options under consideration".
• In Spain, the prime minister has called on lawmakers to enact a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has recommended a comparable action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged families to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors unless guardian approval is provided. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" nature of these apps, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid first step," said the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Eye

In the UK, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "no measure is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, momentum gathered behind a proposal to introduce controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government vowed to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing harmful online content argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," commented a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the state level amid country-wide inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• Florida has signed a measure banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a regulation capping teenagers to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain individuals to mimic Australia's example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Apart from the West, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations strike a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this international debate continues, the steps of Australia and its followers indicate that policymakers globally are less and less content to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.